Hi Prasun,
Thanks for posting your 3DNA-related questions on the Forum. Your case is yet another example of how "weird" parameters can be obtained when non-Watson-Crick base-pairs are involved. In your case it is the two Hoogsteen T-A pairs, as shown below.
****************************************************************************
RMSD of the bases (----- for WC bp, + for isolated bp, x for helix change)
Strand I Strand II Helix
1 (0.032) ...1>B:...3_:[.DG]G-----C[.DC]:..10_:B<...2 (0.025) |
2 (0.029) ...1>B:...4_:[.DG]G-----C[.DC]:...9_:B<...2 (0.026) |
3 (0.018) ...1>B:...5_:[.DC]C-----G[.DG]:...8_:B<...2 (0.043) |
4 (0.030) ...1>B:...6_:[.DA]A-**+-T[.DT]:...7_:B<...2 (0.026) |
5 (0.026) ...1>B:...7_:[.DT]T-**+-A[.DA]:...6_:B<...2 (0.030) |
6 (0.043) ...1>B:...8_:[.DG]G-----C[.DC]:...5_:B<...2 (0.018) |
7 (0.026) ...1>B:...9_:[.DC]C-----G[.DG]:...4_:B<...2 (0.029) |
8 (0.025) ...1>B:..10_:[.DC]C-----G[.DG]:...3_:B<...2 (0.032) |
Note: This structure contains 2[2] non-Watson-Crick base-pairs.
In such cases, you may find the 'simple' base-pair and step parameters introduced in 3DNA v2.3 more 'intuitive'.
HTH,
Xiang-Jun