No, I'm not saying or intending to imply that ssDNA and ssRNA are
energetically equivalent. However, from a practical prospective, first it'd be better to have something than nothing. Second, a prediction is just a prediction, it is no guarantee that the "predicted" structure is "real" or even "meaningful": just think about how many predictions you can have from the same program with different settings, not to mention the different software tools available. Third, the recent article "
RNA-Puzzles: A CASP-like evaluation of RNA three-dimensional structure prediction" [April 2012 [18 (4)] issue of the
RNA journal] serves as a proof of my point. In theory (and in practice), a software can easily "predict" many more protein/DNA/RNA structures than the PDB has accumulated over the past 40 years.
Aside from all the augments above, 3DNA does not deal with "energetics" at all (in its current version, at least) -- it is purely geometrical.
Xiang-Jun