Netiquette · Download · News · Gallery · Homepage · DSSR Manual · G-quadruplexes · DSSR-Jmol · DSSR-PyMOL · DSSR Licensing · Video Overview· RNA Covers

Author Topic: Question on base-step parameters calculation in 3DNA  (Read 4978 times)

Offline fcchou

  • with-posts
  • *
  • Posts: 1
    • View Profile
Question on base-step parameters calculation in 3DNA
« on: October 18, 2012, 08:48:00 pm »
I am currently trying to repeat the base-stepping calculation in 3DNA. I read the "technical details" document associated with 3DNA and try to follow "5.5 Step parameters" section. I am doing OK until step 4, where the document states that the axes of "middle-frame"  are simply the average between those of R1’ and R2’. When I computed that myself, I got a different Rm compared to the one given in the document. For example the first element of Rm was calculated as (-0.6616 -0.1982)/2 =-0.4299, which was different to the given value -0.4490. Therefore I was unable to follow the rest of the calculation and get the correct base-step parameters myself.

I am wondering if I misunderstood anything or this is an error of the document. I look forward to your response. Thank you very much!

Offline xiangjun

  • Administrator
  • with-posts
  • *****
  • Posts: 1640
    • View Profile
    • 3DNA homepage
Re: Question on base-step parameters calculation in 3DNA
« Reply #1 on: October 19, 2012, 12:02:56 am »
Thanks for reading the "technical details" -- you are one of the very few users I am aware of who actually work through the examples.

Regarding your specific question, you are right in noticing that the x- and y-axes (the first two columns) of Rm are not the raw average of the corresponding columns of R1' and R2':
Quote
(-0.6616 -0.1982)/2 =-0.4299, which was different to the given value -0.4490
Here Rm, as a proper rotation matrix, is orthonormal; its x-axis and y-axis are normalized, which is precisely where the discrepancy comes from.

HTH,

Xiang-Jun

PS. In going through the doc, I've also noticed a typo in step #2 of section 5.5, where the RollTilt angle should be in degrees instead of Angstroms. I am planning to update the technical details and put it on the web. If you notice anything that can be improved, please post back.
« Last Edit: October 20, 2012, 04:29:43 pm by xiangjun »

 

Created and maintained by Dr. Xiang-Jun Lu [律祥俊] (xiangjun@x3dna.org)
The Bussemaker Laboratory at the Department of Biological Sciences, Columbia University.