1
RNA structures (DSSR) / How the length of the sequence depends on _pdbx_unobs_or_zero_occ_atoms ???
« on: September 04, 2024, 08:45:08 am »
Hello,
I'm trying to understand why dssr says that 4AL5 has 16 nucleotides.
Cif file contains 20 nucleotides UUCACUGCCGUAUAGGCAGC as _entity_poly.pdbx_seq_one_letter_code,
dssr gives only 16 ACUGCCGUAUAGGCAG.
The sequence is explained as
If I understand correctly you removed first to lines because _pdbx_poly_seq_scheme.pdb_mon_id = ? (consequence of _pdbx_unobs_or_zero_occ_residues ? )
But why you should remove C21 and C4 ?
Looks like it has something to do with _pdbx_unobs_or_zero_occ_atoms.
Could you please clarify the situation ?
Thanks in advance.
I'm trying to understand why dssr says that 4AL5 has 16 nucleotides.
Cif file contains 20 nucleotides UUCACUGCCGUAUAGGCAGC as _entity_poly.pdbx_seq_one_letter_code,
dssr gives only 16 ACUGCCGUAUAGGCAG.
The sequence is explained as
Code: [Select]
loop_
_pdbx_poly_seq_scheme.asym_id
_pdbx_poly_seq_scheme.entity_id
_pdbx_poly_seq_scheme.seq_id
_pdbx_poly_seq_scheme.mon_id
_pdbx_poly_seq_scheme.ndb_seq_num
_pdbx_poly_seq_scheme.pdb_seq_num
_pdbx_poly_seq_scheme.auth_seq_num
_pdbx_poly_seq_scheme.pdb_mon_id
_pdbx_poly_seq_scheme.auth_mon_id
_pdbx_poly_seq_scheme.pdb_strand_id
_pdbx_poly_seq_scheme.pdb_ins_code
_pdbx_poly_seq_scheme.hetero
B 2 1 U 1 2 ? ? ? B . n
B 2 2 U 2 3 ? ? ? B . n
B 2 3 C 3 4 4 C C B . n
B 2 4 A 4 5 5 A A B . n
B 2 5 C 5 6 6 C C B . n
B 2 6 U 6 7 7 U U B . n
B 2 7 G 7 8 8 G G B . n
B 2 8 C 8 9 9 C C B . n
B 2 9 C 9 10 10 C C B . n
B 2 10 G 10 11 11 G G B . n
B 2 11 U 11 12 12 U U B . n
B 2 12 A 12 13 13 A A B . n
B 2 13 U 13 14 14 U U B . n
B 2 14 A 14 15 15 A A B . n
B 2 15 G 15 16 16 G G B . n
B 2 16 G 16 17 17 G G B . n
B 2 17 C 17 18 18 C C B . n
B 2 18 A 18 19 19 A A B . n
B 2 19 G 19 20 20 G G B . n
B 2 20 C 20 21 21 C C B . n
If I understand correctly you removed first to lines because _pdbx_poly_seq_scheme.pdb_mon_id = ? (consequence of _pdbx_unobs_or_zero_occ_residues ? )
But why you should remove C21 and C4 ?
Looks like it has something to do with _pdbx_unobs_or_zero_occ_atoms.
Could you please clarify the situation ?
Thanks in advance.