1
RNA structures (DSSR) / Re: Can 3DNA DSSR handle Left-handed DNA?
« on: Yesterday at 09:58:56 pm »
Dear Xiang-Jun,
I am currently using DSSR to help me figure out the base pair, step base pair, helical base pair parameters difference between D and L form B-DNA. I just notice this post is regarding L-form DNA recognition and realize you update DSSR in v2.7.1 to acommondate L-DNA is a sense while I am still using a bit outdated version DSSR v2.6.0-2025jul24 to analyze a native B-DNA duplex and its mirror-image counterpart.
Specifically, I used PDB entry 1BNA as the native structure and generated a mirror-image structure by reflecting the X coordinates(x -> -x). I attached the JSON format output file in this post, but anyway I list the sign inversion conclusion here:
I am also wondering the DSSR V2.7.1 or the newest version will give out the same conclusion or there is some certain adaption when encounter L-form when calculating the parameters. I will be very grateful to your help and sorry if I misunderstood something.
I am currently using DSSR to help me figure out the base pair, step base pair, helical base pair parameters difference between D and L form B-DNA. I just notice this post is regarding L-form DNA recognition and realize you update DSSR in v2.7.1 to acommondate L-DNA is a sense while I am still using a bit outdated version DSSR v2.6.0-2025jul24 to analyze a native B-DNA duplex and its mirror-image counterpart.
Specifically, I used PDB entry 1BNA as the native structure and generated a mirror-image structure by reflecting the X coordinates(x -> -x). I attached the JSON format output file in this post, but anyway I list the sign inversion conclusion here:
Code: [Select]
Shear : no sign inversion
Stretch : no sign inversion
Stagger : sign inversion
Buckle : sign inversion
Propeller : sign inversion
Opening : no sign inversionCode: [Select]
Shift : no sign inversion
Slide : sign inversion
Rise : no sign inversion
Tilt : sign inversion
Roll : no sign inversion
Twist : sign inversionCode: [Select]
x-displacement : no sign inversion
y-displacement : sign inversion
helical rise : no sign inversion
inclination : sign inversion
tip : no sign inversion
helical twist : sign inversionHere which makes me feel confused is that the sign inversion pattern of the base pair parameters is different from that of the step and helical parameters. I understand that if the inversion pattern of bp parameters apply to step/helical bp parameter, such as Twist and Helical Twist will be "no sign inversion" which is impossible since the most distinct difference between native and mirror-image double helix is right and left handed. I looked into X3DNA and also SCHNAaP paper which has detailed description about how to calculate the parameters which makes believe the sign inversion pattern should be same . Probably DSSR has some certain axis direction inversion when calculate step/helical bp parameters which I overlooked.I am also wondering the DSSR V2.7.1 or the newest version will give out the same conclusion or there is some certain adaption when encounter L-form when calculating the parameters. I will be very grateful to your help and sorry if I misunderstood something.
